|
|
|
|
|
Views,thoughts, current events, past events, social behavior, or whatever. M.A.G.A. means to me, "Make America Strong Again.
|
|
Do our and grandchildren really need to learn about gender fluidity..
|
Posted:Jun 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Last Updated:Jun 22, 2019 5:57 pm
5426 Views
|
... a nonsense concept anyway..
How impressionable are infants and ? Science says, "Very impressionable" . Between infant stage and adolescence is when we develop our basic imprinting. Meaning, who , or what, we are attracted to in life, or want to be when we grow up.
Take a , boy or girl, to see a Spiderman movie, the wants to wear a Spiderman costume. Sometimes, wearing a costume allows a person to tap into confidence they didn't know they had, and helps them overcome shyness. The is developing [in part] who they will become, by wearing , and pretending , in the costume.
So why are parents reasoning, taking their to a, "Drag queen story time", in a public library, is a good idea?
Anna , creator of the Facebook group, "500 Mom Strong", has spoken out against Drag Queen Story Hour. She has said, "Drag is extremely offensive to women". "We should not be teaching [male] that dressing like a woman is okay to mock women". I would say, "We should not be teaching our male that dressing like women is okay".
Some of the other augments against this national event have been adults yelling Biblical stuff.
To me, the Bible thumpers have a weak base for their argument, because this only comes down to one, "Nonsense-mind washed", arguing against, the "Mentally confused".
The pro statements for the event, "Events are designed to promote gender diversity, inclusiveness, and providing with LGBTQ role models." " are able to see men who defy rigid gender restrictions and imagine a world where people can present as they wish, where dress up is real." ................  [Call Protection Services]. That quote, reminds me of something M. Jackson said when defending himself in court.
are not going to conceptualize , "Hey these grownups are defying rigid gender restrictions". ...fuck no! This nonsense is done by adults who should be locked up for the mental abuse of a /contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
Do really need LGBTQ role models?
These men dressed as women are said to be ,"Entertainers and have a right to perform in public". ....Okay...so maybe the Library should have female Strippers come to the Library and read for , dressed in their Strip wear. They're Entertainers, too. Maybe your daughters/grand daughters will role model a Stripper.
|
|
|
6
Comments
|
|
Can't call the Bureau before listening.
|
Posted:Jun 15, 2019 3:43 pm
Last Updated:Sep 30, 2019 1:45 pm
5193 Views
|
I just knew some would misquote President Trump , yet again due "Fake news".
misreports in his blog: "Just when you think the Trump cannot go lower, he does. Now Trump says he see nothing wrong with getting opposition dirt on competitors from Russia or other foreign sources. He would not report them to the FBI.
That was not what President Trump said to George Stephanopoulos.
POTUS said [to George], "I think I'd do both [listen and the FBI] , there's nothing wrong with listening. If somebody calls from a country, Norway, we have information on your opponent..Oh.. I think I'd want hear it" ..."It's not interference, it's information, I think I'd take it. If I thought there was something wrong, I'd go to the FBI" .....That's what he said.
Then he went on explain "Opposition research" George.
Basically POTUS said he'd listen then call the FBI. Now the Democrats are twirling and fro ...yet again...crying for impeachment..... wasting tax payers on made up charges and pretend investigations, and being hypocritical, as usual.
[Notice abc says in the picture, "I think I'd take" < that is fake news, because that is not all that POTUS said.]
|
|
|
6
Comments
|
|
Snowflake Society....
|
Posted:Jun 12, 2019 11:22 pm
Last Updated:Jun 21, 2019 10:37 pm
5237 Views
|
For a very Snowflake reason, Miley Cyrus is making amends for an answer regarding how she feels about making "Hip Hop" influenced music. [And I use the word , "Music" oh so very vaguely. ]
The article calls Cyrus's answer, a "Controversial comment". I call it, "No big deal".
Cyrus criticized the genre [Hip Hop] in a 20 interview, claiming rappers' lyrics were too lewd and saying, "I can’t listen to that anymore. That’s what pushed off the hip-hop scene a little."
Can't an entertainer be honest like that, any more?
Then some person, known as YouTuber Kenya Wilson, said about the interview, "It wasn't the right thing to say, it was bad, it was racially insensitive, it had racist undertones and it wasn't OK, point blank, period."
"Racially insensitive", "Racist undertones", "Point blank period", LOL.....Are you fucking kidding me?!!
The Political Correctness virus has seriously messed up the people, and these fuckers will be having of their own one day. [maybe]..Seems now we have to agree with everyone, and everyone gets a gold star, no bad words!!
|
|
|
4
Comments
|
|
An Observation of Nonsense
|
Posted:Jun 12, 2019 10:43 pm
Last Updated:Jun 14, 2019 9:30 pm
5107 Views
|
Apparently if you say, [and I quote], "No , but thanks for asking", you get blocked.
The question was, would you like to play with her boobs.
I really don't know why I would want to "Play" with her pair of boobs. That seems childish.
Are men always expected to say, "Yes", to that question? Saying, "No" , apparently gets a person blocked.
|
|
|
7
Comments
|
|
75 years later, the sun sets on D-Day
|
Posted:Jun 6, 2019 9:48 pm
Last Updated:Jun 22, 2019 4:22 am
5631 Views
|
Normandy, France on a sunny day. Such a contrast to June 6th, 75 years ago.
For those remaining heroes who made the journey for this day of commemoration, now in their 80's and 90's, this will be their last visit.
My dad fought in WWII, he had buddies who this beach and he never heard from them again.
I watched CNN and Fox News, I was watching President Macron, and President Trump, in Normandy, give their speeches. Not long , not short. Just perfectly.
I thought President Trump did an outstanding job commemorating the memory of the heroes who sat behind him , on the honor stage, and those that laid at final rest close by.
|
|
|
4
Comments
|
|
Should men have the option to not pay support? Yes.
|
Posted:Jun 3, 2019 10:54 pm
Last Updated:Jul 1, 2019 8:41 pm
4978 Views
|
Paying support should be an option. Not mandatory by law.
Generally, who will choose not to pay support? Men [mostly] whom a woman should have thought harder about getting married to, and/or having [with].
No such thing as deadbeat dad unless a woman makes a deadbeat dad, by mating with a deadbeat.
In the 1990's if a woman and man have sex [dated], and she says she is using birth control, but really isn't, she has the right to raise the without his knowing he even has as a , and then to sue him for retroactive support, even 10 to 20 years later. That man should not be held legally responsible for any payments whatsoever.
Women can trick or r*pe a man, or a male minor , and he could be held legally responsible [liable] for providing monetary support. Courts have ruled that way.
But the court has also ruled, [for the woman] if the sexual intercourse results in the birth of a is involuntary , or without consent, a woman may have just cause for refusing to support the .
Apparently in the U.S. , "The best interest of the ", [when it comes to support] only applies to the male.
Not only are men responsible for whom they did not consent to fathering, but the male is also responsible for whom are not even his genetically.
Apparently then , women have reproductive rights , men have responsibilities. And that's just wrong.
|
|
|
4
Comments
|
|
Woke shit... because fragile minds can't cope
|
Posted:Jun 2, 2019 6:53 pm
Last Updated:Dec 19, 2019 11:18 am
4486 Views
|
A really good to read is; "The Coddling of the American Mind".
I decided to write this little opinion-editorial because a 35 year old woman mentioned , "I would NEVER call any living being a "blithering "
Like your immune system needs to be stressed and challenged, to be strong against everyday germs and viruses, so does a 's social life , or really anyone's social life, needs to be stressed and challenged to be strong against "Tiny bad feelings", that seems to be pushing teens and adults toward suicide and anxiety today.
What's going on today, well since at least 20, on college campuses , are insisting the College protect them from certain words, certain books, certain speakers..... are insisting on "Safe places" on campus. ... Basically college students are getting more and more fragile. Unable to cope with society, such that little adversarial disagreements , or words, or concepts they encounter on campus becomes intolerably painful to their fragile psyches, and they demand safe places to be protected from , what any previous generation would , "Growth and social learning and sharing of ideas, political commentary, etc".
Then these fragile snowflakes, that didn't off themselves due to feeling bullied, go into the big bad world, and get jobs with Huffington Post and write about "Woke shit".
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Gay men who want to look female, should not compete in sports against women.
|
Posted:May 25, 2019 3:18 am
Last Updated:Sep 23, 2019 12:04 am
3607 Views
|
Mary Gregory, a man who chose to look like a woman, was 11 months into his 12 month hormone therapy, when he was stripped of his 4 World Record Power Lifting titles in Women's Power Lifting , after sports officials discovered he had not completed his "Transformation" into a woman.
Even if he had completed his transformation, he still has the denser bone structure of a male, more muscle mass than a female, stronger ligaments than a female.
Trans-persons should compete against the gender they were born into, or in separate Trans-events.
Men, essentially, pretending to be women, competing against actual women, is not fair to women. Women have worked hard for a very long time, to compete in sporting events against women, not compete against men who feel they are women.
A transgender is not a new gender person . A transgender person is someone who wanted to transform their body into how they think of their self.
Does gender reassignment surgery and taking certain pharmaceuticals make a woman, now a man? No.
Does gender reassignment surgery and taking certain pharmaceuticals make a man, now a woman? No
I suggest giving them their own sports category.
|
|
|
3
Comments
|
|
"Hate Speech" Does NOT Exist
|
Posted:May 14, 2019 8:29 pm
Last Updated:Jun 2, 2019 9:23 pm
3971 Views
|
"If all printers were determined not to print anything till they were sure it would offend nobody, there would be very little printed." ~ Benjamin Franklin
"That's uncalled for"..."My feelings are hurt by that"...."If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything".... "That offends me"....
Those are examples of legal social censorship, or bullying you to conform ["Your opinion doesn't matter"], someone using legal micro-aggression of censorship on YOU, for voicing, or writing YOUR opinions. Then , usually, when that doesn't silence you, then you're called names...and if that doesn't make you conform, then violence is used against you. Those people have lost the ability to engage in a Socratic debate.
Political Correctness [synonymous with Cultural Marxism] from its inception was designed as a political weapon to silence voices of dissent ... which is why the "New Left" [Democratic party] in the 1970's adopted it and used it ... and that's why, "What is PC"...is ever changing.... PC/Cultural Marxism lends itself so fashionably to easy labels: Trans-phobic, Homophobic, Xenophobic, Racist/bigoted, Uncle Tom, White privilege. All of these are slaps on people with politically incorrect opinions in an attempt to silence those with PC incorrect opinions.
Now the hot new Cultural Marxist label is , "Hate Speech".
"Hate Speech" really doesn't exist. This is just a set of words put together to make people conform to whatever the "Correct" thinking is suppose to be at the moment.
Free Speech , in the United States , is a Constitutional given Right, to protect a persons right to "Say"/"Write" hateful commentary... or really protecting the minorities Right to speak their mind without being bullied into silence by the majority. The legislated line is already drawn at inciting to do harm to another. That, you are not free to say , nor write.
PC/Cultural Marxism creates an inability for you to criticize bad ideas , bad ideologies. Or to criticize what you think is a bad idea or bad ideology.
|
|
|
5
Comments
|
|
Wisdom from Charlie [we should all know]..
|
Posted:May 4, 2019 7:21 pm
Last Updated:Jun 2, 2019 9:21 pm
4226 Views
|
She gave me a cupcake .. it was a really good cupcake!!
Sure... ..we all love cupcakes .. doesn't mean you have to love the baker.
Never, ever, confuse cupcakes with love.
When she freely gives you her cupcake, your only obligation is to enjoy her cupcake.
No reason to get emotionally involved...
Because if you do get emotionally involved, you're stuck eating the same damn cupcake for the rest of your life.
There will always be other cupcakes... and if the day comes when you find yourself in a cupcake drought... you just shell out a couple of bucks for a tasty ho-ho.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Netflix says No No to calling rom-com movies ChickFlicks
|
Posted:Apr 24, 2019 9:15 pm
Last Updated:Jun 7, 2019 3:55 pm
4656 Views
|
What do you think of Netflix telling everyone to stop calling romantic comedies or movies with a female lead actors , "Chick Flicks"?
Runaway Bride, ....Princess Bride, ... When Harry Met Sally,....You Got Mail...A Star Is Born ... Crazy Rich Asians, ..... If Beal Street Could Talk,....Wonder Woman ? .....Girls Trip,.....Beauty and Beast.... Out of Africa,..... Bridges of Madison County.....[For some examples].
NetFlix said," The term also cheapens the work that goes into making these types of films. And nicknaming films “chick flicks” drives home that there’s something trivial about watching them. But what’s trivial about watching a film that makes you feel 1,000 emotions in ~90 minutes?"
"Cheapen", "Trivial"?! No it doesn't.... Nick naming certain films "Chick Flicks" drives home something women want to lose themselves emotionally in, watching these movies.
Then the article says, ""Relegating these stories to “chick flicks” and “chick literature” is just another way for the patriarchy to make us feel apologetic about finding happiness.""
Okay, first, women, by biology, are many times more emotional than men [before he gets old and loses most of his testosterone]. Are there exceptions? Yes... but very few.
Second, is this suppose to be some kind of swipe on the "Big bad patriarchy" -broody face boo hoo? Like , getting women all riled up, again, but this time instead of politics, the launch target is , "Entertainment" now?
My view on that? They have no right to tell me, you, if the film isn't about chickens, don't call them chick flicks ever again.. That's almost like the Networks [TV]/media trying to make us accept Transgenders as really people who have changed their gender. ....LOL.. are you kidding me?!
|
|
|
3
Comments
|
|
To link to this blog (Heathen_G) use [blog Heathen_G] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
221
|
|
231
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
